Data & Methodology — Burleson County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Burleson County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

463 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1936 to 2016.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 257 1939–2020 89%
67% of limit ↓ 57% below
Manganese 93 1989–2020 98%
26% of limit ↓ 60% below
Chloride 95 1936–2016 100%
19% of limit ↓ 47% below
Sulfate 95 1936–2016 100%
15% of limit ↓ 47% below
Nitrate 119 1936–2016 88%
4% of limit ↓ 82% below
Lead 92 1993–2020 11%
27% of limit ↑ 60% above
Arsenic 92 1993–2020 12%
32% of limit ~ typical
Fluoride 409 1936–2020 99%
5% of limit ↓ 79% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
— —
Nitrite 2 2015–2016 0%
— —
PFHxS municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
— —
PFNA municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
— —
PFOA municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
— —
PFOS municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
— —
Radon 1 2015 100%
97% of limit ↑ 169% above
Uranium 19 2009–2020 5%
8% of limit ↓ 46% below
Sodium 95 1936–2016 100%
— ↑ 25% above
pH 91 1939–2016 100%
— ~ typical
PFBS municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
— —
Hardness 95 1936–2016 100%
— ↓ 73% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Compare your result with Burleson County

Of the 92 arsenic tests on record for Burleson County (1993–2020), 88% found none.

Of the 95 chloride tests on record for Burleson County (1936–2016), 0% found none, and half were below 47 mg/L.

Of the 409 fluoride tests on record for Burleson County (1936–2020), 1% found none, and half were below 200 µg/L.

Of the 257 iron tests on record for Burleson County (1939–2020), 11% found none, and half were below 150 µg/L.

Of the 92 lead tests on record for Burleson County (1993–2020), 89% found none.

Of the 93 manganese tests on record for Burleson County (1989–2020), 2% found none, and half were below 12.3 µg/L.

Of the 119 nitrate tests on record for Burleson County (1936–2016), 12% found none, and half were below 400 µg/L.

Of the 95 sulfate tests on record for Burleson County (1936–2016), 0% found none, and half were below 38 mg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 257 samples
  • Manganese 93 samples
  • Chloride 95 samples
  • Sulfate 95 samples
  • Nitrate 119 samples
  • Lead 92 samples
  • Arsenic 92 samples
  • Fluoride 409 samples
  • Uranium 19 samples
  • Sodium 95 samples
  • pH 91 samples
  • Hardness 95 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrite 2 samples
  • Radon 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Burleson County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Burleson County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Burleson County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Burleson County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Nitrate Cancer prevalence 5.7% 6.1% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 8.5% 7.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Burleson County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →