Data & Methodology — Martin County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Martin County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

39 well testing events on record, covering 18 analytes. Data spans 1964 to 2025.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. MN Avg
Manganese 13 1964–2015 100%
1240% of limit ↑ 153% above
Iron 17 1964–2015 94%
786% of limit ~ typical
PFOA municipal 23 2023–2024 83%
26000% of limit ↑ 5947% above
PFOS municipal 30 2023–2024 87%
8912% of limit ↑ 4334% above
PFHxS municipal 13 2023–2024 69%
1900% of limit ↑ 2275% above
Sulfate 18 1964–2014 100%
87% of limit ↑ 359% above
PFNA municipal 16 2023–2024 75%
92% of limit ↑ 451% above
Arsenic 21 1979–2015 81%
40% of limit ↓ 53% below
Lead 21 1979–2015 29%
39% of limit ~ typical
Chloride 25 1964–2025 100%
1% of limit ↓ 86% below
Fluoride 15 1964–2009 93%
6% of limit ~ typical
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 4 2023–2024 0%
— —
Nitrate 15 1964–2009 87%
0% of limit ↓ 98% below
Nitrite 4 2009 25%
0% of limit ↓ 97% below
Sodium 16 1964–2009 100%
— ↑ 124% above
pH 4 1964–1979 100%
— ~ typical
PFBS municipal 14 2023–2024 71%
— ↑ 1575% above
Hardness 4 1964–1979 100%
— ↑ 138% above

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across MN.

Compare your result with Martin County

Of the 21 arsenic tests on record for Martin County (1979–2015), 19% found none, and half were below 1.9 µg/L.

Of the 25 chloride tests on record for Martin County (1964–2025), 0% found none, and half were below 2.67 mg/L.

Of the 21 lead tests on record for Martin County (1979–2015), 71% found none.

Of the 26 pfos tests on record for Martin County, 0% found none, and half were below 0.356 µg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 17 samples
  • PFOA 23 samples
  • PFOS 30 samples
  • Sulfate 18 samples
  • PFNA 16 samples
  • Arsenic 21 samples
  • Lead 21 samples
  • Chloride 25 samples
  • Fluoride 15 samples
  • Nitrate 15 samples
  • Sodium 16 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Manganese 13 samples
  • PFHxS 13 samples
  • Nitrite 4 samples
  • pH 4 samples
  • PFBS 14 samples
  • Hardness 4 samples

Public vs. Private Water in Martin County

22 Active public water systems
17,101 Residents on public water
21% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Martin County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Martin County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Martin County Prevalence MN Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 8.8% 7.0% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.6% 2.9% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 5.8% 6.6% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Martin County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in MN with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →