Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Windsor County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
31 well testing events on record, covering
22 analytes.
Data spans 1952 to 2025.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. VT Avg
Radon
164
1995–2002
100%
268% of limit
↓ 40% below
Manganese
982
1966–2017
100%
6% of limit
↓ 99% below
Iron
796
1966–2017
100%
17% of limit
↓ 92% below
Lead
3979
2002–2017
98%
7% of limit
↓ 91% below
Chloride
1691
1966–2017
100%
1% of limit
↓ 88% below
Arsenic
1965
1995–2017
26%
10% of limit
↓ 81% below
Uranium
1748
1995–2017
77%
3% of limit
↓ 59% below
Nitrate
1262
1966–2017
100%
2% of limit
↓ 24% below
Fluoride
1953
1966–2017
100%
1% of limit
↓ 60% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
9
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrite
1236
1994–2017
99%
2% of limit
~ typical
PFHxS
municipal
9
2023–2025
0%
—
—
PFNA
municipal
9
2023–2025
0%
—
—
PFOA
municipal
9
2023–2025
0%
—
—
PFOS
municipal
9
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Sulfate
45
1966–2017
100%
5% of limit
~ typical
Sodium
768
1966–2017
100%
—
↓ 60% below
E. coli
1
2002–2017
97%
—
↓ 93% below
Hardness
493
1966–2017
100%
—
↓ 45% below
Total Coliform
1
2002–2017
0%
—
—
pH
64
1966–2017
100%
—
~ typical
PFBS
municipal
9
2023–2025
11%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across VT.
Compare your result with Windsor County
Of the 1965 arsenic tests on record for Windsor County (1995–2017),
74% found none.
Of the 1691 chloride tests on record for Windsor County (1966–2017),
0% found none, and half were below 2.5 mg/L.
Of the 1953 fluoride tests on record for Windsor County (1966–2017),
0% found none, and half were below 50 µg/L.
Of the 796 iron tests on record for Windsor County (1966–2017),
1% found none, and half were below 50 µg/L.
Of the 3979 lead tests on record for Windsor County (2002–2017),
2% found none, and half were below 1 µg/L.
Of the 982 manganese tests on record for Windsor County (1966–2017),
0% found none, and half were below 3 µg/L.
Of the 1262 nitrate tests on record for Windsor County (1966–2017),
0% found none, and half were below 250 µg/L.
Of the 45 sulfate tests on record for Windsor County (1966–2017),
0% found none, and half were below 11.5 mg/L.
Of the 1748 uranium tests on record for Windsor County (1995–2017),
23% found none, and half were below 1 µg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Radon 164 samples
Manganese 982 samples
Iron 796 samples
Lead 3979 samples
Chloride 1691 samples
Arsenic 1965 samples
Uranium 1748 samples
Nitrate 1262 samples
Fluoride 1953 samples
Nitrite 1236 samples
Sulfate 45 samples
Sodium 768 samples
Hardness 493 samples
pH 64 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
E. coli 1 sample
Total Coliform 1 sample
No private-well PFAS data for Windsor County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Windsor County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Windsor County
164Active public water systems
68,857Residents on public water
38%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Windsor County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Windsor County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Windsor County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Windsor County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Windsor County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Windsor County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Windsor County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in VT with at least one sample for that analyte.