Data & Methodology — Loudoun County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Loudoun County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

696 well testing events on record, covering 19 analytes. Data spans 1930 to 2026.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. VA Avg
Manganese 17 1994–2014 53%
370% of limit ↑ 195% above
PFOA municipal 40 2023–2025 20%
146% of limit
Iron 37 1970–2014 76%
8% of limit ↓ 90% below
PFOS municipal 40 2023–2025 12%
198% of limit
Radon 13 1994–1999 100%
8% of limit ↓ 90% below
Sulfate 37 1970–2014 100%
4% of limit ↓ 64% below
Chloride 37 1970–2014 100%
2% of limit ↓ 79% below
Uranium 17 1994–2014 41%
1% of limit ↑ 23% above
Nitrite 25 1975–2014 28%
1% of limit ~ typical
PFHxS municipal 40 2023–2025 5%
32% of limit
Nitrate 27 1970–2014 70%
10% of limit ↑ 48% above
PFNA municipal 40 2023–2025 0%
Fluoride 37 1970–2014 84%
2% of limit ↓ 33% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 40 2023–2025 0%
Lead 7 1999–2014 14%
1% of limit ↓ 43% below
Hardness 37 1970–2014 100%
↑ 50% above
PFBS municipal 40 2023–2025 35%
pH 33 1970–2014 100%
~ typical
Sodium 37 1970–2014 100%
↓ 39% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across VA.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 17 samples
  • Iron 37 samples
  • Sulfate 37 samples
  • Chloride 37 samples
  • Uranium 17 samples
  • Nitrite 25 samples
  • Nitrate 27 samples
  • Fluoride 37 samples
  • Hardness 37 samples
  • pH 33 samples
  • Sodium 37 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Radon 13 samples
  • Lead 7 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Loudoun County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Loudoun County. PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Loudoun County

102 Active public water systems
433,414 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Loudoun County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Loudoun County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Loudoun County Prevalence VA Average Source Year
PFOA Cancer prevalence 5.6% 6.7% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Loudoun County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in VA with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →