Data & Methodology — Zapata County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Zapata County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

88 well testing events on record, covering 13 analytes. Data spans 1977 to 2020.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 39 1961–2017 90%
71% of limit
Manganese 33 1994–2017 88%
38% of limit
Arsenic 33 1994–2017 15%
41% of limit
Fluoride 83 1961–2017 92%
15% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 1 2025 0%
Lead 33 1994–2017 0%
Nitrate 16 1994 38%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 1 2025 0%
PFNA municipal 1 2025 0%
PFOA municipal 1 2025 0%
PFOS municipal 1 2025 0%
Uranium 5 2009–2017 0%
PFBS municipal 1 2025 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 39 samples
  • Manganese 33 samples
  • Arsenic 33 samples
  • Fluoride 83 samples
  • Lead 33 samples
  • Nitrate 16 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Uranium 5 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Zapata County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Zapata County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Zapata County

4 Active public water systems
17,075 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Zapata County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →