Data & Methodology — Victoria County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Victoria County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

269 well testing events on record, covering 19 analytes. Data spans 1959 to 2021.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 134 1934–2017 60%
63% of limit
Manganese 112 1949–2017 58%
41% of limit
Arsenic 107 1992–2017 58%
47% of limit
Chloride 5 2009–2010 100%
33% of limit
Fluoride 247 1945–2017 97%
9% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 6 2024–2025 0%
Lead 107 1992–2017 11%
8% of limit
Nitrate 7 1992–2010 86%
1% of limit
Nitrite 5 2009–2010 20%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 6 2024–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 6 2024–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 6 2024–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 6 2024–2025 0%
Sulfate 5 2009–2010 100%
6% of limit
Uranium 37 2009–2017 35%
7% of limit
Sodium 5 2009–2010 100%
pH 6 2009–2010 100%
PFBS municipal 6 2024–2025 0%
Hardness 5 2009–2010 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 134 samples
  • Manganese 112 samples
  • Arsenic 107 samples
  • Fluoride 247 samples
  • Lead 107 samples
  • Uranium 37 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 5 samples
  • Nitrate 7 samples
  • Nitrite 5 samples
  • Sulfate 5 samples
  • Sodium 5 samples
  • pH 6 samples
  • Hardness 5 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Victoria County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Victoria County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Victoria County

49 Active public water systems
83,840 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Victoria County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Victoria County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Victoria County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.3% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.4% 3.3% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Victoria County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →