Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Travis County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
3280 well testing events on record, covering
22 analytes.
Data spans 1967 to 2017.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. TX Avg
PFOS
municipal
133
2023–2025
16%
138% of limit
~ typical
Iron
978
1938–2022
53%
20% of limit
↓ 87% below
Fluoride
2656
1937–2023
98%
8% of limit
↓ 69% below
PFOA
municipal
133
2023–2025
4%
152% of limit
↑ 27% above
PFNA
municipal
133
2023–2025
5%
244% of limit
↑ 95% above
Manganese
827
1938–2022
37%
6% of limit
↓ 91% below
Sulfate
1013
1978–2023
100%
12% of limit
↓ 59% below
Lead
682
1977–2022
26%
2% of limit
↓ 90% below
Chloride
1013
1978–2023
100%
8% of limit
↓ 78% below
Arsenic
744
1978–2022
52%
4% of limit
↓ 89% below
Nitrate
1170
1971–2023
94%
14% of limit
↓ 36% below
Nitrite
1004
1978–2023
16%
1% of limit
~ typical
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
133
2023–2025
0%
—
—
PFHxS
municipal
133
2023–2025
23%
48% of limit
~ typical
Radon
1
2017
100%
41% of limit
~ typical
Uranium
267
1980–2022
55%
3% of limit
↓ 81% below
E. coli
1
2008–2017
19%
—
~ typical
Hardness
1011
1978–2023
100%
—
↑ 35% above
PFBS
municipal
132
2023–2025
23%
—
↑ 24% above
pH
1299
1978–2024
100%
—
~ typical
Sodium
1011
1978–2023
100%
—
↓ 90% below
Total Coliform
1
1978–2017
75%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.
Compare your result with Travis County
Of the 744 arsenic tests on record for Travis County (1978–2022),
48% found none.
Of the 1013 chloride tests on record for Travis County (1978–2023),
0% found none, and half were below 19.5 mg/L.
Of the 2656 fluoride tests on record for Travis County (1937–2023),
2% found none, and half were below 300 µg/L.
Of the 978 iron tests on record for Travis County (1938–2022),
47% found none, and half were below 4.2 µg/L.
Of the 682 lead tests on record for Travis County (1977–2022),
74% found none.
Of the 827 manganese tests on record for Travis County (1938–2022),
63% found none.
Of the 1170 nitrate tests on record for Travis County (1971–2023),
6% found none, and half were below 1.4 mg/L.
Of the 1013 sulfate tests on record for Travis County (1978–2023),
0% found none, and half were below 28.9 mg/L.
Of the 267 uranium tests on record for Travis County (1980–2022),
45% found none, and half were below 0.43 µg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Iron 978 samples
Fluoride 2656 samples
Manganese 827 samples
Sulfate 1013 samples
Lead 682 samples
Chloride 1013 samples
Arsenic 744 samples
Nitrate 1170 samples
Nitrite 1004 samples
Uranium 267 samples
Hardness 1011 samples
pH 1299 samples
Sodium 1011 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Radon 1 sample
E. coli 1 sample
Total Coliform 1 sample
No private-well PFAS data for Travis County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Travis County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Travis County
140Active public water systems
1,555,359Residents on public water
4%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Travis County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Travis County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Travis County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Travis County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Travis County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Travis County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Travis County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.