Data & Methodology — Sterling County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Sterling County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

370 well testing events on record, covering 7 analytes. Data spans 1964 to 1966.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 47 1990–2019 40%
22% of limit
Manganese 46 1990–2019 24%
4% of limit
Arsenic 46 1990–2019 46%
26% of limit
Fluoride 370 1961–2019 100%
22% of limit
Lead 45 1990–2019 7%
16% of limit
Nitrate 14 1990–1995 100%
26% of limit
Uranium 5 2007–2019 100%
8% of limit

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 47 samples
  • Manganese 46 samples
  • Arsenic 46 samples
  • Fluoride 370 samples
  • Lead 45 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrate 14 samples
  • Uranium 5 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Sterling County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Sterling County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Sterling County

2 Active public water systems
930 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Sterling County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →