Data & Methodology — Smith County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Smith County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

810 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1962 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 617 1938–2018 77%
47% of limit
Manganese 497 1938–2018 44%
25% of limit
Lead 201 1977–2018 8%
12% of limit
Arsenic 212 1977–2018 2%
72% of limit
Chloride 9 1971–2015 100%
2% of limit
Fluoride 725 1938–2018 91%
5% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 146 2023–2025 0%
Nitrate 43 1971–2015 72%
0% of limit
Nitrite 2 2015 0%
PFHxS municipal 146 2023–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 146 2023–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 146 2023–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 146 2023–2025 0%
Radon 2 2015 100%
36% of limit
Sulfate 9 1971–2015 100%
4% of limit
Uranium 54 2010–2018 0%
Hardness 9 1971–2015 100%
PFBS municipal 146 2023–2025 0%
pH 9 1971–2015 100%
Sodium 9 1971–2015 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 617 samples
  • Manganese 497 samples
  • Lead 201 samples
  • Arsenic 212 samples
  • Fluoride 725 samples
  • Nitrate 43 samples
  • Uranium 54 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 9 samples
  • Nitrite 2 samples
  • Radon 2 samples
  • Sulfate 9 samples
  • Hardness 9 samples
  • pH 9 samples
  • Sodium 9 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Smith County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Smith County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Smith County

47 Active public water systems
281,614 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Smith County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Smith County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Smith County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Lead Heart disease rate 6.2% 7.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Smith County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →