Data & Methodology — Martin County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Martin County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

231 well testing events on record, covering 16 analytes. Data spans 2001 to 2016.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Arsenic 161 1983–2021 84%
220% of limit ↑ 476% above
Fluoride 222 1957–2021 100%
92% of limit ↑ 287% above
Nitrate 57 1989–2016 100%
75% of limit ↑ 237% above
Chloride 5 2001–2016 100%
98% of limit ↑ 175% above
Sulfate 5 2001–2016 100%
87% of limit ↑ 206% above
Radon 5 2001–2016 100%
10% of limit ↓ 72% below
Uranium 37 2001–2021 100%
55% of limit ↑ 257% above
Iron 125 1959–2021 54%
34% of limit ↓ 78% below
Manganese 102 1957–2021 55%
5% of limit ↓ 93% below
Lead 97 1989–2021 10%
11% of limit ↓ 36% below
Nitrite 5 2001–2016 20%
0% of limit ↓ 71% below
Total Coliform 2 2016 0%
— —
Sodium 5 2001–2016 100%
— ↑ 36% above
pH 5 2001–2016 100%
— ~ typical
Hardness 5 2001–2016 100%
— ↑ 116% above
E. coli 2 2016 0%
— —

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Compare your result with Martin County

Of the 161 arsenic tests on record for Martin County (1983–2021), 16% found none, and half were below 16 µg/L.

Of the 222 fluoride tests on record for Martin County (1957–2021), 0% found none, and half were below 3.7 mg/L.

Of the 125 iron tests on record for Martin County (1959–2021), 46% found none, and half were below 18 µg/L.

Of the 97 lead tests on record for Martin County (1989–2021), 90% found none.

Of the 102 manganese tests on record for Martin County (1957–2021), 45% found none, and half were below 0.373 µg/L.

Of the 57 nitrate tests on record for Martin County (1989–2016), 0% found none, and half were below 7.5 mg/L.

Of the 37 uranium tests on record for Martin County (2001–2021), 0% found none, and half were below 16.6 µg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Arsenic 161 samples
  • Fluoride 222 samples
  • Nitrate 57 samples
  • Uranium 37 samples
  • Iron 125 samples
  • Manganese 102 samples
  • Lead 97 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 5 samples
  • Sulfate 5 samples
  • Radon 5 samples
  • Nitrite 5 samples
  • Total Coliform 2 samples
  • Sodium 5 samples
  • pH 5 samples
  • Hardness 5 samples
  • E. coli 2 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Martin County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Martin County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Martin County

5 Active public water systems
3,378 Residents on public water
22% Households on private wells

Public water systems in Martin County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Martin County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Martin County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.5% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 2.8% 3.3% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Martin County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →