Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Limestone County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
238 well testing events on record, covering
19 analytes.
Data spans 1965 to 2016.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. TX Avg
Manganese
50
1938–2018
72%
179% of limit
↑ 178% above
Iron
175
1938–2018
89%
92% of limit
↓ 40% below
Chloride
66
1981–1982
100%
20% of limit
↓ 44% below
Lead
30
1981–2018
27%
20% of limit
~ typical
Sulfate
66
1981–1982
94%
8% of limit
↓ 72% below
Arsenic
30
1981–2018
40%
10% of limit
↓ 74% below
Fluoride
228
1938–2018
94%
5% of limit
↓ 79% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
8
2024–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrate
57
1981–2007
61%
2% of limit
↓ 93% below
Nitrite
28
1981–1982
64%
0% of limit
↓ 100% below
PFHxS
municipal
8
2024–2025
0%
—
—
PFNA
municipal
8
2024–2025
0%
—
—
PFOA
municipal
8
2024–2025
0%
—
—
PFOS
municipal
8
2024–2025
0%
—
—
Uranium
6
2010–2018
0%
—
—
Sodium
66
1981–1982
100%
—
↓ 35% below
pH
66
1981–1982
100%
—
~ typical
PFBS
municipal
8
2024–2025
12%
—
~ typical
Hardness
66
1981–1982
100%
—
↓ 62% below
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.
Compare your result with Limestone County
Of the 30 arsenic tests on record for Limestone County (1981–2018),
60% found none.
Of the 66 chloride tests on record for Limestone County (1981–1982),
0% found none, and half were below 50 mg/L.
Of the 228 fluoride tests on record for Limestone County (1938–2018),
6% found none, and half were below 200 µg/L.
Of the 175 iron tests on record for Limestone County (1938–2018),
11% found none, and half were below 150 µg/L.
Of the 30 lead tests on record for Limestone County (1981–2018),
73% found none.
Of the 50 manganese tests on record for Limestone County (1938–2018),
28% found none, and half were below 40 µg/L.
Of the 57 nitrate tests on record for Limestone County (1981–2007),
39% found none, and half were below 80 µg/L.
Of the 66 sulfate tests on record for Limestone County (1981–1982),
6% found none, and half were below 18.5 mg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Manganese 50 samples
Iron 175 samples
Chloride 66 samples
Lead 30 samples
Sulfate 66 samples
Arsenic 30 samples
Fluoride 228 samples
Nitrate 57 samples
Nitrite 28 samples
Sodium 66 samples
pH 66 samples
Hardness 66 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Uranium 6 samples
No private-well PFAS data for Limestone County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Limestone County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Limestone County
23Active public water systems
25,595Residents on public water
15%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Limestone County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Limestone County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Limestone County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Limestone County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Limestone County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Limestone County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Limestone County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.