Data & Methodology — Lamb County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Lamb County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

507 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 2001 to 2003.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Sulfate 10 2001–2003 100%
40% of limit
Uranium 48 2001–2021 98%
28% of limit
Chloride 10 2001–2003 100%
63% of limit
Arsenic 154 1990–2021 81%
48% of limit
Fluoride 501 1937–2021 100%
50% of limit
Manganese 156 1955–2021 37%
3% of limit
Nitrate 36 1990–2003 94%
35% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 2 2025 0%
Iron 167 1945–2021 33%
7% of limit
Lead 154 1990–2021 12%
11% of limit
Nitrite 14 2001–2003 29%
6% of limit
PFHxS municipal 2 2025 0%
PFNA municipal 2 2025 0%
PFOA municipal 2 2025 0%
PFOS municipal 2 2025 0%
Radon 2 2001 100%
10% of limit
Sodium 10 2001–2003 100%
pH 14 2001–2003 100%
PFBS municipal 2 2025 0%
Hardness 10 2001–2003 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Uranium 48 samples
  • Arsenic 154 samples
  • Fluoride 501 samples
  • Manganese 156 samples
  • Nitrate 36 samples
  • Iron 167 samples
  • Lead 154 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Sulfate 10 samples
  • Chloride 10 samples
  • Nitrite 14 samples
  • Radon 2 samples
  • Sodium 10 samples
  • pH 14 samples
  • Hardness 10 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Lamb County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Lamb County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Lamb County

12 Active public water systems
12,062 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Lamb County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Lamb County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Lamb County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.2% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 4.1% 3.3% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Lamb County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →