Data & Methodology — Jasper County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Jasper County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

364 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1942 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Manganese 140 1962–2021 84%
75% of limit
Iron 232 1941–2021 76%
53% of limit
Chloride 62 1942–2005 100%
3% of limit
Nitrate 80 1942–2005 95%
2% of limit
Arsenic 127 1992–2021 15%
29% of limit
Fluoride 329 1941–2021 92%
5% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 18 2023–2024 0%
Lead 126 1992–2021 13%
7% of limit
Nitrite 5 2005 0%
PFHxS municipal 18 2023–2024 0%
PFNA municipal 18 2023–2024 0%
PFOA municipal 18 2023–2024 0%
PFOS municipal 18 2023–2024 0%
Radon 5 2005 100%
7% of limit
Sulfate 62 1942–2005 100%
2% of limit
Uranium 54 2005–2021 11%
0% of limit
Sodium 62 1942–2005 100%
pH 54 1950–2005 100%
PFBS municipal 18 2023–2024 0%
Hardness 61 1942–2005 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Manganese 140 samples
  • Iron 232 samples
  • Chloride 62 samples
  • Nitrate 80 samples
  • Arsenic 127 samples
  • Fluoride 329 samples
  • Lead 126 samples
  • Sulfate 62 samples
  • Uranium 54 samples
  • Sodium 62 samples
  • pH 54 samples
  • Hardness 61 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrite 5 samples
  • Radon 5 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Jasper County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Jasper County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Jasper County

26 Active public water systems
33,108 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Jasper County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Jasper County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Jasper County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Nitrate Cancer prevalence 5.8% 6.1% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Jasper County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →