Data & Methodology — Frio County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Frio County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

572 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1928 to 2018.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Iron 326 1928–2018 93%
133% of limit
Manganese 223 1939–2018 72%
44% of limit
Chloride 73 1928–2015 100%
11% of limit
Sulfate 71 1928–2015 100%
24% of limit
Nitrate 109 1928–2015 91%
4% of limit
Fluoride 511 1939–2018 99%
10% of limit
Arsenic 170 1990–2018 1%
14% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
Lead 170 1990–2018 4%
28% of limit
Nitrite 2 2015 0%
PFHxS municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
Radon 2 2015 100%
28% of limit
Uranium 51 2010–2018 12%
7% of limit
Hardness 70 1928–2015 100%
PFBS municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
pH 57 1939–2015 100%
Sodium 70 1928–2015 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 326 samples
  • Manganese 223 samples
  • Chloride 73 samples
  • Sulfate 71 samples
  • Nitrate 109 samples
  • Fluoride 511 samples
  • Arsenic 170 samples
  • Lead 170 samples
  • Uranium 51 samples
  • Hardness 70 samples
  • pH 57 samples
  • Sodium 70 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrite 2 samples
  • Radon 2 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Frio County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Frio County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Frio County

7 Active public water systems
15,824 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Frio County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Frio County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Frio County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Nitrate Cancer prevalence 4.6% 6.1% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Frio County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →