Data & Methodology — Crosby County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Crosby County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

190 well testing events on record, covering 14 analytes. Data spans 1961 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Nitrate 12 1990–2001 100%
14% of limit
Arsenic 98 1990–2021 89%
65% of limit
Fluoride 189 1970–2021 99%
74% of limit
Iron 103 1985–2021 22%
4% of limit
Manganese 98 1990–2021 37%
4% of limit
Chloride 2 2001 100%
51% of limit
Lead 98 1990–2021 5%
7% of limit
Nitrite 2 2001 0%
Radon 2 2001 100%
8% of limit
Sulfate 2 2001 100%
27% of limit
Uranium 28 2001–2021 100%
31% of limit
Sodium 2 2001 100%
pH 2 2001 100%
Hardness 2 2001 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Arsenic 98 samples
  • Fluoride 189 samples
  • Iron 103 samples
  • Manganese 98 samples
  • Lead 98 samples
  • Uranium 28 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrate 12 samples
  • Chloride 2 samples
  • Nitrite 2 samples
  • Radon 2 samples
  • Sulfate 2 samples
  • Sodium 2 samples
  • pH 2 samples
  • Hardness 2 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Crosby County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Crosby County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Crosby County

6 Active public water systems
5,217 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Crosby County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Crosby County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Crosby County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.2% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 4.1% 3.3% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Crosby County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →