Data & Methodology — Cochran County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Cochran County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

229 well testing events on record, covering 14 analytes. Data spans 2001 to 2003.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Sulfate 5 2001–2003 100%
107% of limit ↑ 274% above
Chloride 5 2001–2003 100%
67% of limit ↑ 87% above
Arsenic 105 1990–2021 90%
77% of limit ↑ 102% above
Manganese 106 1956–2021 55%
13% of limit ↓ 80% below
Fluoride 227 1947–2021 100%
72% of limit ↑ 203% above
Uranium 36 2001–2021 100%
24% of limit ↑ 53% above
Iron 119 1956–2021 39%
9% of limit ↓ 94% below
Lead 105 1990–2021 13%
9% of limit ↓ 45% below
Nitrate 18 1990–2003 100%
29% of limit ↑ 32% above
Nitrite 6 2001–2003 17%
0% of limit ↓ 71% below
Radon 2 2001 100%
8% of limit ↓ 76% below
Sodium 5 2001–2003 100%
— ↓ 41% below
pH 6 2001–2003 100%
— ~ typical
Hardness 5 2001–2003 100%
— ↑ 154% above

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Compare your result with Cochran County

Of the 105 arsenic tests on record for Cochran County (1990–2021), 10% found none, and half were below 7 µg/L.

Of the 227 fluoride tests on record for Cochran County (1947–2021), 0% found none, and half were below 2.9 mg/L.

Of the 119 iron tests on record for Cochran County (1956–2021), 61% found none.

Of the 105 lead tests on record for Cochran County (1990–2021), 87% found none.

Of the 106 manganese tests on record for Cochran County (1956–2021), 45% found none, and half were below 0.346 µg/L.

Of the 36 uranium tests on record for Cochran County (2001–2021), 0% found none, and half were below 7.12 µg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Arsenic 105 samples
  • Manganese 106 samples
  • Fluoride 227 samples
  • Uranium 36 samples
  • Iron 119 samples
  • Lead 105 samples
  • Nitrate 18 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Sulfate 5 samples
  • Chloride 5 samples
  • Nitrite 6 samples
  • Radon 2 samples
  • Sodium 5 samples
  • pH 6 samples
  • Hardness 5 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Cochran County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Cochran County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Cochran County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Cochran County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.1% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.8% 3.3% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Cochran County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →