Data & Methodology — Chambers County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Chambers County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

708 well testing events on record, covering 20 analytes. Data spans 1935 to 2023.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Chloride 438 1935–2014 100%
109% of limit
Manganese 116 1958–2021 94%
95% of limit
Iron 186 1948–2021 89%
67% of limit
Nitrate 138 1941–2014 78%
15% of limit
Arsenic 109 1990–2021 33%
32% of limit
Sulfate 412 1935–2014 99%
2% of limit
Lead 103 1990–2021 8%
8% of limit
Fluoride 358 1941–2021 99%
18% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
Nitrite 19 1994–2014 5%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 12 2023–2025 0%
Radon 8 2002–2014 100%
9% of limit
Uranium 65 1994–2021 34%
7% of limit
Sodium 41 1941–2014 100%
pH 65 1949–2014 100%
PFBS municipal 12 2023–2025 25%
Hardness 396 1935–2014 100%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Chloride 438 samples
  • Manganese 116 samples
  • Iron 186 samples
  • Nitrate 138 samples
  • Arsenic 109 samples
  • Sulfate 412 samples
  • Lead 103 samples
  • Fluoride 358 samples
  • Nitrite 19 samples
  • Uranium 65 samples
  • Sodium 41 samples
  • pH 65 samples
  • Hardness 396 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Radon 8 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Chambers County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Chambers County. PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Public vs. Private Water in Chambers County

57 Active public water systems
56,776 Residents on public water

Public water systems in Chambers County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Chambers County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Chambers County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.7% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 2.7% 3.3% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 6.0% 7.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Chambers County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →