Data & Methodology — Briscoe County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Briscoe County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

193 well testing events on record, covering 14 analytes. Data spans 1964 to 2019.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. TX Avg
Fluoride 190 1938–2021 100%
92% of limit ↑ 287% above
Arsenic 66 1985–2021 77%
88% of limit ↑ 130% above
Iron 107 1946–2021 64%
32% of limit ↓ 79% below
Manganese 97 1955–2021 36%
5% of limit ↓ 92% below
Lead 62 1985–2021 10%
11% of limit ↓ 36% below
Chloride 1 2001 100%
8% of limit ↓ 77% below
Nitrate 7 1991–2001 100%
6% of limit ↓ 72% below
Nitrite 1 2001 0%
— —
Radon 1 2001 100%
10% of limit ↓ 72% below
Sulfate 1 2001 100%
40% of limit ↑ 42% above
Uranium 16 2001–2021 100%
30% of limit ↑ 92% above
Sodium 1 2001 100%
— ↓ 34% below
pH 1 2001 100%
— ~ typical
Hardness 1 2001 100%
— ~ typical

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across TX.

Compare your result with Briscoe County

Of the 66 arsenic tests on record for Briscoe County (1985–2021), 23% found none, and half were below 7.72 µg/L.

Of the 190 fluoride tests on record for Briscoe County (1938–2021), 0% found none, and half were below 3.7 mg/L.

Of the 107 iron tests on record for Briscoe County (1946–2021), 36% found none, and half were below 40 µg/L.

Of the 62 lead tests on record for Briscoe County (1985–2021), 90% found none.

Of the 97 manganese tests on record for Briscoe County (1955–2021), 64% found none.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Fluoride 190 samples
  • Arsenic 66 samples
  • Iron 107 samples
  • Manganese 97 samples
  • Lead 62 samples
  • Uranium 16 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Chloride 1 sample
  • Nitrate 7 samples
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Radon 1 sample
  • Sulfate 1 sample
  • Sodium 1 sample
  • pH 1 sample
  • Hardness 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Briscoe County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Briscoe County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Briscoe County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Briscoe County Prevalence TX Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.7% 6.1% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.3% 3.3% 2020
Lead Heart disease rate 11.2% 7.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Briscoe County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in TX with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →