Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Coshocton County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
278 well testing events on record, covering
18 analytes.
Data spans 1954 to 2021.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. OH Avg
Iron
268
1973–2014
100%
1667% of limit
↑ 280% above
Manganese
258
1973–2014
98%
420% of limit
↑ 138% above
Sulfate
179
1976–2014
99%
22% of limit
↓ 50% below
Arsenic
212
1976–2014
87%
20% of limit
↑ 27% above
Lead
210
1976–2014
46%
0% of limit
↓ 100% below
Fluoride
218
1973–2014
94%
6% of limit
↓ 42% below
Chloride
274
1973–2014
100%
6% of limit
↓ 62% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
2
2024–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrate
28
1973–1988
100%
0% of limit
↓ 99% below
Nitrite
1
1974
100%
0% of limit
↓ 52% below
PFHxS
municipal
2
2024–2025
0%
—
—
PFNA
municipal
4
2008–2025
0%
—
—
PFOA
municipal
4
2008–2025
0%
—
—
PFOS
municipal
2
2024–2025
0%
—
—
Sodium
274
1973–2014
100%
—
↓ 50% below
pH
221
1973–2005
100%
—
~ typical
PFBS
municipal
2
2024–2025
0%
—
—
Hardness
219
1973–2014
100%
—
↓ 48% below
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across OH.
Compare your result with Coshocton County
Of the 212 arsenic tests on record for Coshocton County (1976–2014),
13% found none, and half were below 2 µg/L.
Of the 274 chloride tests on record for Coshocton County (1973–2014),
0% found none, and half were below 14.5 mg/L.
Of the 218 fluoride tests on record for Coshocton County (1973–2014),
6% found none, and half were below 210 µg/L.
Of the 268 iron tests on record for Coshocton County (1973–2014),
0% found none, and half were below 5 mg/L.
Of the 210 lead tests on record for Coshocton County (1976–2014),
54% found none.
Of the 258 manganese tests on record for Coshocton County (1973–2014),
2% found none, and half were below 205 µg/L.
Of the 28 nitrate tests on record for Coshocton County (1973–1988),
0% found none, and half were below 5 µg/L.
Of the 179 sulfate tests on record for Coshocton County (1976–2014),
1% found none, and half were below 54 mg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Iron 268 samples
Manganese 258 samples
Sulfate 179 samples
Arsenic 212 samples
Lead 210 samples
Fluoride 218 samples
Chloride 274 samples
Nitrate 28 samples
Sodium 274 samples
pH 221 samples
Hardness 219 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Nitrite 1 sample
PFNA 4 samples
PFOA 4 samples
Public vs. Private Water in Coshocton County
35Active public water systems
21,460Residents on public water
59%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Coshocton County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Coshocton County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Coshocton County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Coshocton County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Coshocton County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Coshocton County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Coshocton County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in OH with at least one sample for that analyte.