Data & Methodology — Scotland County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Scotland County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

53 well testing events on record, covering 16 analytes. Data spans 1944 to 2021.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. NC Avg
Iron 46 1948–2004 89%
11% of limit ↓ 89% below
Manganese 45 1948–2004 76%
4% of limit ↓ 97% below
Chloride 49 1944–2004 100%
1% of limit ↓ 96% below
Fluoride 44 1948–2004 61%
0% of limit ↓ 90% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
Lead 1 1981 0%
Nitrate 44 1948–1993 73%
1% of limit ↓ 81% below
PFHxS municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
PFNA municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
PFOA municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
PFOS municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
Sulfate 49 1944–2004 100%
0% of limit ↓ 97% below
Hardness 51 1944–2004 100%
↓ 97% below
PFBS municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
pH 49 1948–2004 100%
↓ 24% below
Sodium 44 1955–2004 100%
↓ 96% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across NC.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 46 samples
  • Manganese 45 samples
  • Chloride 49 samples
  • Fluoride 44 samples
  • Nitrate 44 samples
  • Sulfate 49 samples
  • Hardness 51 samples
  • pH 49 samples
  • Sodium 44 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Lead 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Scotland County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Scotland County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in NC with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-07-15

Full methodology →