Data & Methodology — Scotland County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Scotland County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

5868 total samples analyzed across 20 analytes. Data spans 1944 to 2021.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. NC Avg
Manganese 2 1948–1950 50%
120% of limit ~ typical
Iron 59 1948–1992 98%
24% of limit ↓ 75% below
PFOA municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
Chloride 27 1944–1991 100%
1% of limit ↓ 88% below
Sulfate 41 1944–2021 100%
0% of limit ↓ 90% below
PFNA municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFBS municipal 2 2024–2025 0%
Nitrate 1 1950 0%
Fluoride 1 1950 0%
pH 19 1948–1995 100% ↓ 21% below
Sodium 21 1955–2004 95% ↓ 92% below
Hardness 30 1969–1997 100% ↓ 48% below
Total Coliform 1 1969 0%
Fecal Coliform 1 1971 0%
Nitrite 1 1973 0%
Lead 1 1975 0%
Arsenic 1 1977 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across NC.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 59 samples
  • Chloride 27 samples
  • Sulfate 41 samples
  • pH 19 samples
  • Sodium 21 samples
  • Hardness 30 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Manganese 2 samples
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • Fluoride 1 sample
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Arsenic 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Scotland County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Scotland County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in NC with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →