Data & Methodology — Perquimans County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Perquimans County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

7806 total samples analyzed across 19 analytes. Data spans 1958 to 2014.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. NC Avg
Arsenic 2 1974–1977 50%
600% of limit ↑ 818% above
Iron 37 1958–1970 97%
108% of limit ~ typical
Chloride 60 1958–2012 98%
34% of limit ↑ 172% above
Sulfate 46 1958–2012 100%
8% of limit ↑ 78% above
Lead 4 1974–2014 75%
6% of limit ↓ 85% below
Uranium 2 2002–2014 50%
0% of limit ↓ 86% below
PFHxS municipal 6 2023 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 6 2023 0%
0% of limit
PFOA municipal 6 2023 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 6 2023 0%
0% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 6 2023 0%
0% of limit
Nitrite 3 1970–1971 67%
0% of limit ↓ 65% below
PFBS municipal 6 2023 0%
Fecal Coliform 1 1971 0%
Hardness 45 1976–1999 100% ↑ 298% above
pH 19 1958–2012 100% ~ typical
Sodium 43 1958–2014 98% ↑ 45% above
Nitrate 1 1958 0%
Manganese 1 1958 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across NC.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 37 samples
  • Chloride 60 samples
  • Sulfate 46 samples
  • Hardness 45 samples
  • pH 19 samples
  • Sodium 43 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Arsenic 2 samples
  • Lead 4 samples
  • Uranium 2 samples
  • Nitrite 3 samples
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • Manganese 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Perquimans County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Perquimans County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Perquimans County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Perquimans County Prevalence NC Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 5.9% 6.7% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 2.9% 3.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Perquimans County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in NC with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →