Data & Methodology — Columbus County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Columbus County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

41 well testing events on record, covering 16 analytes. Data spans 1941 to 2024.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. NC Avg
Iron 29 1948–1998 100%
30% of limit ↓ 89% below
Manganese 24 1948–1998 100%
0% of limit ↓ 100% below
Nitrate 28 1948–1998 100%
1% of limit ↓ 89% below
Chloride 34 1941–1998 100%
3% of limit ↓ 58% below
Fluoride 31 1941–1998 94%
15% of limit ↑ 174% above
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 18 2023–2025 0%
— —
Nitrite 2 1998 50%
5% of limit ↑ 321% above
PFHxS municipal 18 2023–2025 0%
— —
PFNA municipal 18 2023–2025 0%
— —
PFOA municipal 18 2023–2025 0%
— —
PFOS municipal 18 2023–2025 0%
— —
Sulfate 32 1941–1998 100%
1% of limit ↓ 75% below
Sodium 17 1954–1998 100%
— ↑ 223% above
pH 30 1948–1998 100%
— ~ typical
PFBS municipal 18 2023–2025 0%
— —
Hardness 33 1941–1998 100%
— ↓ 31% below

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across NC.

Compare your result with Columbus County

Of the 34 chloride tests on record for Columbus County (1941–1998), 0% found none, and half were below 6.65 mg/L.

Of the 31 fluoride tests on record for Columbus County (1941–1998), 6% found none, and half were below 600 µg/L.

Of the 29 iron tests on record for Columbus County (1948–1998), 0% found none, and half were below 90 µg/L.

Of the 24 manganese tests on record for Columbus County (1948–1998), 0% found none.

Of the 28 nitrate tests on record for Columbus County (1948–1998), 0% found none, and half were below 80 µg/L.

Of the 32 sulfate tests on record for Columbus County (1941–1998), 0% found none, and half were below 2.35 mg/L.

Have a number from your lab? Enter it to see where it falls. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Want the full picture for your well? Check all your results.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Iron 29 samples
  • Manganese 24 samples
  • Nitrate 28 samples
  • Chloride 34 samples
  • Fluoride 31 samples
  • Sulfate 32 samples
  • Sodium 17 samples
  • pH 30 samples
  • Hardness 33 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Nitrite 2 samples

No private-well PFAS data for Columbus County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Columbus County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Columbus County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Columbus County Prevalence NC Average Source Year
Nitrate Cancer prevalence 5.7% 6.7% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 3.5% 3.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Columbus County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in NC with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-08-04

Full methodology →