Data & Methodology — Buncombe County

Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Buncombe County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.

Contaminant Data — All Analytes

19754 total samples analyzed across 30 analytes. Data spans 1954 to 2024.

Contaminant Samples Years Detection Rate Distribution LowModHigh vs. Limit vs. NC Avg
Arsenic 2 1970 50%
150% of limit ↑ 130% above
Radon 25 2003–2014 100%
25% of limit ↓ 82% below
Manganese 72 1979–2010 99%
38% of limit ↓ 67% below
Chloride 71 1954–2010 99%
1% of limit ↓ 89% below
Iron 6 1954–1959 83%
13% of limit ↓ 86% below
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFHxS municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOA municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
Sulfate 73 1954–2009 99%
2% of limit ↓ 65% below
Fluoride 2 1954–1958 50%
2% of limit ↓ 50% below
Uranium 10 1977–2014 90%
0% of limit ↓ 30% below
PFHxS municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOA municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFNA municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
PFOS municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
HFPO-DA (GenX) municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
0% of limit
Uranium 10 1977–2014 90%
0% of limit ↓ 30% below
Iron 6 1954–1959 83%
13% of limit ↓ 86% below
Nitrite 1 1979 0%
pH 15 1954–2024 100% ~ typical
Sodium 66 1954–2024 100% ↓ 75% below
Lead 1 1976 0%
PFBS municipal 24 2023–2025 0%
Nitrate 1 1957 0%
Fecal Coliform 1 1972 0%
Hardness 31 1975–2024 100% ↓ 58% below
Total Coliform 1 1987 0%
E. coli 1 2022 0%

Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across NC.

Data Coverage & Gaps

Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)

  • Radon 25 samples
  • Manganese 72 samples
  • Chloride 71 samples
  • Sulfate 73 samples
  • pH 15 samples
  • Sodium 66 samples
  • Hardness 31 samples

Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution

  • Arsenic 2 samples
  • Iron 6 samples
  • Fluoride 2 samples
  • Uranium 10 samples
  • Uranium 10 samples
  • Iron 6 samples
  • Nitrite 1 sample
  • Lead 1 sample
  • Nitrate 1 sample
  • Fecal Coliform 1 sample
  • Total Coliform 1 sample
  • E. coli 1 sample

No private-well PFAS data for Buncombe County

We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Buncombe County. PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →

CDC Health Outcome Correlations

Where contaminants detected in Buncombe County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.

Contaminant Associated Condition Buncombe County Prevalence NC Average Source Year
Arsenic Cancer prevalence 6.1% 6.7% 2020
Arsenic Kidney disease rate 2.6% 3.4% 2020

Source: CDC PLACES county-level estimates. Raw data: Download Buncombe County CDC PLACES data →

Data Sources

This report aggregates data from the following public databases:

Methodology

Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.

Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.

State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in NC with at least one sample for that analyte.

Last updated: 2026-05-28

Full methodology →