Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Yolo County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
405 well testing events on record, covering
25 analytes.
Data spans 1930 to 2020.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. CA Avg
Boron
2
2005
100%
108% of limit
↑ 551% above
Manganese
184
1965–2021
33%
60% of limit
↓ 81% below
Chloride
372
1940–2021
100%
17% of limit
↓ 44% below
Arsenic
156
1970–2021
97%
31% of limit
↓ 21% below
Nitrate
176
1955–2021
98%
18% of limit
↓ 23% below
Iron
190
1951–2021
35%
7% of limit
↓ 95% below
Sulfate
295
1940–2021
96%
13% of limit
↓ 35% below
Fluoride
252
1940–2021
100%
5% of limit
↓ 28% below
PFOA
municipal
70
2023–2025
0%
—
—
PFHxS
municipal
70
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Lead
72
1970–2020
14%
1% of limit
↓ 85% below
Radon
8
2005
100%
7% of limit
↓ 92% below
PFNA
municipal
70
2023–2025
1%
42% of limit
↓ 21% below
Uranium
30
1997–2021
93%
4% of limit
↓ 32% below
PFOS
municipal
70
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Chromium (total)
2
2005
100%
24% of limit
↑ 787% above
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
5
2005
0%
—
—
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
70
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrite
33
1981–2021
12%
2% of limit
↑ 62% above
Perchlorate
2
2005
0%
—
—
Tds
2
2005
100%
—
↑ 53% above
Sodium
371
1940–2021
100%
—
↓ 23% below
PFBS
municipal
70
2023–2025
0%
—
—
pH
372
1951–2021
100%
—
~ typical
Hardness
371
1940–2021
100%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across CA.
Compare your result with Yolo County
Of the 156 arsenic tests on record for Yolo County (1970–2021),
3% found none, and half were below 3 µg/L.
Of the 372 chloride tests on record for Yolo County (1940–2021),
0% found none, and half were below 42 mg/L.
Of the 252 fluoride tests on record for Yolo County (1940–2021),
0% found none, and half were below 200 µg/L.
Of the 190 iron tests on record for Yolo County (1951–2021),
65% found none.
Of the 72 lead tests on record for Yolo County (1970–2020),
86% found none.
Of the 184 manganese tests on record for Yolo County (1965–2021),
67% found none.
Of the 176 nitrate tests on record for Yolo County (1955–2021),
2% found none, and half were below 1.73 mg/L.
Of the 295 sulfate tests on record for Yolo County (1940–2021),
4% found none, and half were below 29 mg/L.
Of the 30 uranium tests on record for Yolo County (1997–2021),
7% found none, and half were below 1 µg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Manganese 184 samples
Chloride 372 samples
Arsenic 156 samples
Nitrate 176 samples
Iron 190 samples
Sulfate 295 samples
Fluoride 252 samples
Lead 72 samples
Uranium 30 samples
Nitrite 33 samples
Sodium 371 samples
pH 372 samples
Hardness 371 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Boron 2 samples
Radon 8 samples
Chromium (total) 2 samples
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5 samples
Perchlorate 2 samples
Tds 2 samples
No private-well PFAS data for Yolo County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Yolo County.
PFAS has been detected in local public water systems (UCMR 5 data) — indicated by the "municipal" badge in the table above — but this does not directly indicate private well contamination.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Yolo County
89Active public water systems
259,964Residents on public water
10%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Yolo County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Yolo County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Yolo County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Yolo County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Yolo County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Yolo County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Yolo County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in CA with at least one sample for that analyte.