Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Santa Barbara County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
10131 well testing events on record, covering
25 analytes.
Data spans 1927 to 2025.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. CA Avg
Radon
21
2011
100%
253% of limit
↑ 178% above
Manganese
3143
1943–2023
87%
260% of limit
~ typical
Sulfate
6690
1924–2023
100%
104% of limit
↑ 414% above
Iron
4141
1924–2023
80%
30% of limit
↓ 76% below
Chloride
9860
1924–2023
100%
43% of limit
↑ 43% above
Nitrate
4628
1927–2023
80%
14% of limit
↓ 43% below
Arsenic
459
1958–2021
83%
8% of limit
↓ 80% below
Lead
272
1954–2021
33%
7% of limit
↓ 28% below
Uranium
125
2008–2021
93%
7% of limit
↑ 22% above
Fluoride
5921
1941–2023
97%
8% of limit
~ typical
Boron
9
2008–2021
100%
15% of limit
~ typical
Chromium (total)
9
2008–2021
22%
1% of limit
↓ 67% below
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
10
2008–2021
0%
—
—
PFOA
municipal
161
2021–2025
1%
30% of limit
↓ 82% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
161
2021–2025
0%
—
—
Nitrite
2025
1980–2023
28%
0% of limit
↓ 59% below
PFOS
municipal
161
2021–2025
1%
38% of limit
↓ 82% below
Perchlorate
10
2008–2021
90%
14% of limit
↑ 102% above
PFHxS
municipal
161
2021–2025
1%
55% of limit
~ typical
PFNA
municipal
161
2021–2025
0%
—
—
Tds
9
2008–2021
100%
—
↑ 235% above
Hardness
7517
1924–2023
100%
—
↑ 130% above
Sodium
6706
1924–2023
100%
—
↑ 27% above
pH
7850
1930–2023
100%
—
~ typical
PFBS
municipal
161
2021–2025
2%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across CA.
Compare your result with Santa Barbara County
Of the 459 arsenic tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1958–2021),
17% found none, and half were below 0.52 µg/L.
Of the 9860 chloride tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1924–2023),
0% found none, and half were below 107 mg/L.
Of the 5921 fluoride tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1941–2023),
3% found none, and half were below 300 µg/L.
Of the 4141 iron tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1924–2023),
20% found none, and half were below 40 µg/L.
Of the 272 lead tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1954–2021),
67% found none.
Of the 3143 manganese tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1943–2023),
13% found none, and half were below 73.5 µg/L.
Of the 4628 nitrate tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1927–2023),
20% found none, and half were below 678 µg/L.
Of the 6690 sulfate tests on record for Santa Barbara County (1924–2023),
0% found none, and half were below 259 mg/L.
Of the 125 uranium tests on record for Santa Barbara County (2008–2021),
7% found none, and half were below 1.56 µg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Radon 21 samples
Manganese 3143 samples
Sulfate 6690 samples
Iron 4141 samples
Chloride 9860 samples
Nitrate 4628 samples
Arsenic 459 samples
Lead 272 samples
Uranium 125 samples
Fluoride 5921 samples
PFOA 161 samples
HFPO-DA (GenX) 161 samples
Nitrite 2025 samples
PFOS 161 samples
PFHxS 161 samples
PFNA 161 samples
Hardness 7517 samples
Sodium 6706 samples
pH 7850 samples
PFBS 161 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Boron 9 samples
Chromium (total) 9 samples
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 10 samples
Perchlorate 10 samples
Tds 9 samples
Public vs. Private Water in Santa Barbara County
150Active public water systems
488,317Residents on public water
2%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Santa Barbara County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Santa Barbara County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Santa Barbara County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Santa Barbara County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Santa Barbara County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Santa Barbara County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Santa Barbara County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in CA with at least one sample for that analyte.