Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Mendocino County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
250 well testing events on record, covering
27 analytes.
Data spans 1951 to 2025.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. CA Avg
Radon
30
1993–2012
100%
103% of limit
~ typical
Iron
161
1969–2020
75%
97% of limit
↓ 21% below
Manganese
143
1969–2020
80%
16% of limit
↓ 95% below
Boron
13
2009–2020
100%
8% of limit
↓ 49% below
Arsenic
90
1982–2020
70%
5% of limit
↓ 86% below
PFOS
municipal
52
2019–2025
10%
112% of limit
↓ 46% below
Lead
88
1982–2020
33%
2% of limit
↓ 83% below
PFOA
municipal
52
2019–2025
2%
172% of limit
~ typical
Chloride
183
1960–2020
100%
3% of limit
↓ 89% below
Perchlorate
12
2009–2019
25%
4% of limit
↓ 37% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
46
2023–2025
0%
—
—
Uranium
46
2009–2020
63%
0% of limit
↓ 97% below
Nitrite
44
1981–2020
25%
0% of limit
↓ 84% below
Sulfate
176
1960–2020
84%
4% of limit
↓ 78% below
PFNA
municipal
52
2019–2025
0%
—
—
Chromium (total)
13
2009–2020
8%
4% of limit
↑ 37% above
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
12
2009–2019
0%
—
—
Fluoride
166
1960–2020
93%
2% of limit
↓ 64% below
Nitrate
63
1960–2020
87%
7% of limit
↓ 69% below
PFHxS
municipal
49
2019–2025
6%
36% of limit
↓ 36% below
Tds
13
2009–2020
100%
—
↓ 49% below
Total Coliform
1
2009–2020
32%
—
~ typical
pH
213
1960–2020
100%
—
~ typical
Sodium
180
1960–2020
100%
—
↓ 79% below
E. coli
1
2009–2020
9%
—
~ typical
Hardness
183
1960–2020
99%
—
↓ 45% below
PFBS
municipal
49
2019–2025
10%
—
~ typical
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across CA.
Compare your result with Mendocino County
Of the 90 arsenic tests on record for Mendocino County (1982–2020),
30% found none, and half were below 0.165 µg/L.
Of the 183 chloride tests on record for Mendocino County (1960–2020),
0% found none, and half were below 8.13 mg/L.
Of the 166 fluoride tests on record for Mendocino County (1960–2020),
7% found none, and half were below 100 µg/L.
Of the 161 iron tests on record for Mendocino County (1969–2020),
25% found none, and half were below 84 µg/L.
Of the 88 lead tests on record for Mendocino County (1982–2020),
67% found none.
Of the 143 manganese tests on record for Mendocino County (1969–2020),
20% found none, and half were below 1.6 µg/L.
Of the 63 nitrate tests on record for Mendocino County (1960–2020),
13% found none, and half were below 467 µg/L.
Of the 176 sulfate tests on record for Mendocino County (1960–2020),
16% found none, and half were below 8.22 mg/L.
Of the 46 uranium tests on record for Mendocino County (2009–2020),
37% found none, and half were below 11 ng/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Radon 30 samples
Iron 161 samples
Manganese 143 samples
Arsenic 90 samples
PFOS 52 samples
Lead 88 samples
PFOA 52 samples
Chloride 183 samples
Uranium 46 samples
Nitrite 44 samples
Sulfate 176 samples
PFNA 52 samples
Fluoride 166 samples
Nitrate 63 samples
PFHxS 49 samples
pH 213 samples
Sodium 180 samples
Hardness 183 samples
PFBS 49 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Boron 13 samples
Perchlorate 12 samples
Chromium (total) 13 samples
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 12 samples
Tds 13 samples
Total Coliform 1 sample
E. coli 1 sample
Public vs. Private Water in Mendocino County
147Active public water systems
83,529Residents on public water
28%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Mendocino County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Mendocino County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Mendocino County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Mendocino County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Mendocino County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Mendocino County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Mendocino County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in CA with at least one sample for that analyte.