Full contaminant data, sample history, and sourcing for Lassen County. For readers who want to go beyond the summary.
Contaminant Data — All Analytes
127 well testing events on record, covering
27 analytes.
Data spans 1953 to 2023.
Contaminant
Samples
Years
Detection Rate
Distribution LowModHigh
vs. Limit
vs. CA Avg
Radon
20
2010
100%
138% of limit
↑ 52% above
Manganese
52
1980–2020
58%
40% of limit
↓ 87% below
Nitrate
51
1961–2020
96%
4% of limit
↓ 81% below
Iron
54
1980–2020
52%
8% of limit
↓ 94% below
Arsenic
54
1980–2020
100%
26% of limit
↓ 32% below
Sulfate
85
1961–2020
100%
7% of limit
↓ 64% below
Fluoride
76
1961–2020
97%
6% of limit
~ typical
Chloride
97
1961–2020
100%
4% of limit
↓ 88% below
Perchlorate
5
2010
40%
4% of limit
↓ 42% below
Nitrite
32
2008–2020
25%
0% of limit
↓ 84% below
HFPO-DA (GenX)
municipal
14
2024
0%
—
—
PFOS
municipal
14
2024
0%
—
—
Uranium
32
2008–2020
100%
2% of limit
↓ 72% below
PFOA
municipal
14
2024
0%
—
—
PFNA
municipal
14
2024
0%
—
—
Boron
5
2010
100%
54% of limit
↑ 223% above
Chromium (total)
5
2010
60%
0% of limit
↓ 84% below
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
5
2010
0%
—
—
PFHxS
municipal
14
2024
0%
—
—
Lead
40
1980–2020
40%
0% of limit
↓ 98% below
Tds
5
2010
100%
—
↑ 79% above
Total Coliform
1
2010–2021
5%
—
~ typical
pH
119
1961–2020
100%
—
~ typical
Sodium
92
1961–2020
100%
—
↓ 48% below
E. coli
1
2010–2021
5%
—
~ typical
Hardness
97
1961–2020
100%
—
↓ 63% below
PFBS
municipal
14
2024
0%
—
—
Distribution shows the share of samples in each concentration band relative to the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): Low = below half the MCL, Moderate = between half and the MCL, High = above the MCL. Analytes without an MCL (e.g. sodium, pH) show — in the limit columns. State average is based on county median values across CA.
Compare your result with Lassen County
Of the 54 arsenic tests on record for Lassen County (1980–2020),
0% found none, and half were below 2.65 µg/L.
Of the 97 chloride tests on record for Lassen County (1961–2020),
0% found none, and half were below 9.2 mg/L.
Of the 76 fluoride tests on record for Lassen County (1961–2020),
3% found none, and half were below 225 µg/L.
Of the 54 iron tests on record for Lassen County (1980–2020),
48% found none, and half were below 3.3 µg/L.
Of the 40 lead tests on record for Lassen County (1980–2020),
60% found none.
Of the 52 manganese tests on record for Lassen County (1980–2020),
42% found none, and half were below 0.33 µg/L.
Of the 51 nitrate tests on record for Lassen County (1961–2020),
4% found none, and half were below 429 µg/L.
Of the 85 sulfate tests on record for Lassen County (1961–2020),
0% found none, and half were below 18 mg/L.
Of the 32 uranium tests on record for Lassen County (2008–2020),
0% found none, and half were below 0.456 µg/L.
Data Coverage & Gaps
Well-sampled analytes (15+ samples)
Radon 20 samples
Manganese 52 samples
Nitrate 51 samples
Iron 54 samples
Arsenic 54 samples
Sulfate 85 samples
Fluoride 76 samples
Chloride 97 samples
Nitrite 32 samples
Uranium 32 samples
Lead 40 samples
pH 119 samples
Sodium 92 samples
Hardness 97 samples
Limited data (<15 samples) — interpret with caution
Perchlorate 5 samples
Boron 5 samples
Chromium (total) 5 samples
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5 samples
Tds 5 samples
Total Coliform 1 sample
E. coli 1 sample
No private-well PFAS data for Lassen County
We have no private well sampling data for PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, and related chemicals) in Lassen County.
PFAS testing for private wells requires a dedicated lab panel (~$300–$500). If you are near a military base, airport, or industrial site, consider testing proactively. Learn more about PFAS →
Public vs. Private Water in Lassen County
55Active public water systems
24,759Residents on public water
36%Households on private wells
Public water systems in Lassen County are regulated by the EPA and must test and report contaminant levels. Private well owners are responsible for their own testing — there is no routine monitoring of private wells by any government agency.
CDC Health Outcome Correlations
Where contaminants detected in Lassen County have established associations with specific health outcomes, we cross-reference CDC PLACES county-level prevalence data. This is a contextual signal, not a causal claim.
This report aggregates data from the following public databases:
Water Quality Portal (WQP) — groundwater sample results for Lassen County from EPA, USGS, and state agencies. Browse WQP data →
EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) — public water system inventory used to estimate the share of residents on private wells. Browse SDWIS →
Census ACS 5-Year Estimates — well and cistern household counts (variable DP04_0074E) used to calculate the private-well percentage for Lassen County. Census data explorer →
USGS Aquifer Atlas — principal aquifer type underlying Lassen County, which informs which contaminants are geologically likely. USGS Aquifer Atlas →
EPA UCMR 5 (2023–2025) — PFAS occurrence data from public water systems, used as a proxy indicator for aquifer PFAS exposure. Rows marked "municipal" in the table above come from this source. About UCMR 5 →
EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) — industrial facility chemical releases near Lassen County, used in contamination risk scoring. TRI Explorer →
EPA Superfund NPL — National Priorities List sites in or near Lassen County, used in contamination risk scoring. Superfund site search →
CDC PLACES — county-level health outcome prevalence (kidney disease, cancer, heart disease) correlated with detected contaminants. About CDC PLACES →
Methodology
Raw records are downloaded from the Water Quality Portal and normalized to µg/L (ppb). Records are deduplicated by sample ID and date, and certified outliers are excluded. Analyte names are mapped to EPA canonical forms. Detection rates, distribution bands, and MCL comparisons are computed from the normalized dataset.
Distribution bands use the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level as the threshold: concentrations below 50% of the MCL are classed as Low, between 50% and 100% as Moderate, and above 100% as High. For analytes without an MCL (sodium, hardness, pH), distribution is not computed.
State comparison uses the median of county median values across all counties in CA with at least one sample for that analyte.